| Peer-Reviewed

Reintegration Technique (Missing Parts): In Conservation-Restoration of Antiquities

Received: 29 September 2022    Accepted: 17 October 2022    Published: 30 October 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The conservation, protection and enhancement of the historical values present in the archaeological and cultural heritage should be the only important concern. It is important to emphasize that, wherever possible during the integration and reintegration phases, the historical and aesthetic aspects of the monument are respected. The aim of restoration is not only to conserve the integrity of the resource, but also to reveal its cultural values and to improve the legibility of its original design. The aim of modern restoration - to reveal the original state within the limits of still existing material-thus differs from the past aim of bringing back the original by rebuilding a lost form. Therefore, any work on an object must be preceded by the studies of the physical and documentary evidences, object’s condition and significance of its cultural value. The regular maintenance of the Cultural heritage objects, both recently restored and non-restored, it is of great significance in the preservation and enhance of object’s durability. The treatment of gaps is not just the final act in a restoration, but must be viewed in a preliminary vision of the work of the relevant aspects of degradation and conservation, before and after the restoration. Reintegration intervention in the restoration, still have not found a unique methodology and precise, but it still relies on a case-by-case basis. Reintegration itself is an act of bringing together the components of painting or objects, stone or other materials, into a single fully seen harmony with the missing parts functioning as one.

Published in International Journal of Archaeology (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12
Page(s) 38-45
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Conservation, Archaeology, Egyptology, Heritage, Conservation Science, Integration, Restoration, Art

References
[1] Bernard Feilden & J. Jokilehto, Management Guidelines for world cultural heritage sites, ICCROM, Rome 1993.
[2] Lucas and Harris, Ancient Egyptian Materials and Industries, (revised edition) London 1962.
[3] Paolo Mora, L., and P. Philppot, The Conservation of Mural Paintings, Rome, ICCROM 1977.
[4] Museums & Galleries Commission, Preservation Science Teaching Series, Science for Conservators, Cleaning vol. 2. Chapter, 1. pp. 14-15, New York & London. 1992.
[5] Lotfi Khaled Hassan. “A Preliminary report, Conservation of wall paintings of small temple at Medinet Habu,” Unpublished. The Oriental Institute, Chicago University. USA. 2007.
[6] S. Quirke & J. Spencer, Ancient Egypt. London, 2001.
[7] Paul Getty Institute, Nefatari Luci D’Egitto, Roma, 1995.
[8] Kent Weeks, KV5: A Preliminary Report on the Excavation of the Tomb of the Sons of Ramses II in the Valley of the Kings, Conservation, 1994 -1999 P 135. AUC, Cairo. 2000.
[9] H. J. Plenderleith, The Preservation of Antiquities, Oxford. 1934.
[10] Johns Mills & Raymond White, The organic Chemistry of Museum Objects, 2nd ed., London. 1994.
[11] J. Paul Getty Museum, Nefertari, Conservation of Wall Paintings, California. 1992.
[12] Lotfi Khaled Hassan, Modern Conservation Technique: Wall Paintings in the Valley of the Queens, a Testament to the Beauty of a Dual Conservation-Restoration Approach, International Journal of Archaeology. Vol. 4, No. 6, 2016, pp. 95-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20160406.12.
[13] Muir, Kim.” Approaches to the reintegration of paint loss: theory and practice in the conservation of easel paintings.” Studies in Conservation 54: sup1, 19–28. DOI: 10.1179/sic.2009.54. Supplement-1.1.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Lotfi Khaled Hassan. (2022). Reintegration Technique (Missing Parts): In Conservation-Restoration of Antiquities. International Journal of Archaeology, 10(2), 38-45. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Lotfi Khaled Hassan. Reintegration Technique (Missing Parts): In Conservation-Restoration of Antiquities. Int. J. Archaeol. 2022, 10(2), 38-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Lotfi Khaled Hassan. Reintegration Technique (Missing Parts): In Conservation-Restoration of Antiquities. Int J Archaeol. 2022;10(2):38-45. doi: 10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12,
      author = {Lotfi Khaled Hassan},
      title = {Reintegration Technique (Missing Parts): In Conservation-Restoration of Antiquities},
      journal = {International Journal of Archaeology},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {38-45},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ija.20221002.12},
      abstract = {The conservation, protection and enhancement of the historical values present in the archaeological and cultural heritage should be the only important concern. It is important to emphasize that, wherever possible during the integration and reintegration phases, the historical and aesthetic aspects of the monument are respected. The aim of restoration is not only to conserve the integrity of the resource, but also to reveal its cultural values and to improve the legibility of its original design. The aim of modern restoration - to reveal the original state within the limits of still existing material-thus differs from the past aim of bringing back the original by rebuilding a lost form. Therefore, any work on an object must be preceded by the studies of the physical and documentary evidences, object’s condition and significance of its cultural value. The regular maintenance of the Cultural heritage objects, both recently restored and non-restored, it is of great significance in the preservation and enhance of object’s durability. The treatment of gaps is not just the final act in a restoration, but must be viewed in a preliminary vision of the work of the relevant aspects of degradation and conservation, before and after the restoration. Reintegration intervention in the restoration, still have not found a unique methodology and precise, but it still relies on a case-by-case basis. Reintegration itself is an act of bringing together the components of painting or objects, stone or other materials, into a single fully seen harmony with the missing parts functioning as one.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Reintegration Technique (Missing Parts): In Conservation-Restoration of Antiquities
    AU  - Lotfi Khaled Hassan
    Y1  - 2022/10/30
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12
    T2  - International Journal of Archaeology
    JF  - International Journal of Archaeology
    JO  - International Journal of Archaeology
    SP  - 38
    EP  - 45
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-7595
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ija.20221002.12
    AB  - The conservation, protection and enhancement of the historical values present in the archaeological and cultural heritage should be the only important concern. It is important to emphasize that, wherever possible during the integration and reintegration phases, the historical and aesthetic aspects of the monument are respected. The aim of restoration is not only to conserve the integrity of the resource, but also to reveal its cultural values and to improve the legibility of its original design. The aim of modern restoration - to reveal the original state within the limits of still existing material-thus differs from the past aim of bringing back the original by rebuilding a lost form. Therefore, any work on an object must be preceded by the studies of the physical and documentary evidences, object’s condition and significance of its cultural value. The regular maintenance of the Cultural heritage objects, both recently restored and non-restored, it is of great significance in the preservation and enhance of object’s durability. The treatment of gaps is not just the final act in a restoration, but must be viewed in a preliminary vision of the work of the relevant aspects of degradation and conservation, before and after the restoration. Reintegration intervention in the restoration, still have not found a unique methodology and precise, but it still relies on a case-by-case basis. Reintegration itself is an act of bringing together the components of painting or objects, stone or other materials, into a single fully seen harmony with the missing parts functioning as one.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • The Epigraphic Survey, The Oriental Institute, Chicago University, Chicago, USA

  • Sections